|
Hey there, I got an interesting question from a reader recently: What do you do when a severely depressed client gets stuck trying to bridge from a current trigger back to deeper childhood material? Picture this in your office: You’re working with a client in the middle of a heavy depressive episode. They’re recounting a recent trigger (i.e. a critical email from a supervisor or an argument with a partner). You work with them to identify the negative cognition and somatic connection, and attempt a float-back to trace that belief to its historical roots, like early childhood emotional neglect or attachment loss. But instead of an organic connection, they hit a wall. There’s nothing. Every path dead-ends, and they keep circling back to last week’s work review, repeating the same hopeless thoughts. When this happens, your heart rate might tick up a bit. It’s easy to feel like you’ve hit a dead end, or to worry that the client is resisting the process. In my own clinical work, I’ve learned to view this dead-end as useful diagnostic data, which is key to how the DeprEnd framework handles severe depression. Why the Gate ExistsIn the DeprEnd protocol, we intentionally restrict early target selection to memories tied strictly to the onset and maintenance of the current episode. When someone is in the depths of severe depression, their brain operates under significant neurobiological and cognitive limits. Their window of tolerance narrows and restricts real-time access to adaptive information networks. This ceiling is rarely a psychological defense mechanism, but a capacity limit caused by the state of depression itself. So how do you navigate this ceiling without forcing the system beyond its capacity? Building Bridge StrategiesThe first thing I do in severe depression cases is shift my focus away from the float-back, because the client’s system is compromised and lacks the bandwidth to process deep attachment wounds right now. Instead, we target intermediate memories that sit in the middle ground. These can include:
Think of these targets as a bridge. They sit closer in time and context to the present, which means they share common neural pathways with older historical material. As you process these middle-tier memories, you gently loosen the pressure on the broader implicit memory network and underlying touchstone memories. Quite often, once these intermediate rungs are cleared, the client’s nervous system relaxes enough to allow spontaneous float-backs to childhood material, naturally and without forcing the entry. Rethinking Phase 2 for DepressionThis shift in sequencing also requires us to reframe how we approach Phase 2 preparation when working with depression. In traditional trauma work, resourcing often centers on imagery (like safe state places, protective figures, or container exercises), but in depression work, behavioral activation is resourcing. That’s why encouraging small, structured activities that generate even a slight sense of mastery or modest pleasure actively rebuilds the adaptive information network from the outside in. A few things to keep in mind as you adjust Phase 2 for these clients:
Before moving into touchstone-memory work, I always pause to make sure I’m seeing clear signs of readiness. Readiness Criteria for Touchstone Memory Work In my experience, moving into historical touchstone targets works best once I've observed these specific clinical indicators in session:
If you observe continuous looping during sets, somatic shutdown, or a sudden drift back into heavy depressive ruminations, it’s important to treat those as signals to retreat back to lower, safer rungs. Continue working on stabilization and behavioral activation. Closing CautionsAll this in mind, before advancing to deep historical processing, I always prioritize basic safety boundaries: Active suicidal ideation fundamentally changes how I structure treatment. When suicidal ideation is active, trauma processing takes a back seat to conservative pacing, stabilization, and direct risk management. Sequencing decisions around early attachment trauma in severe depression are rarely straightforward. If you find yourself second-guessing whether a client’s system is ready for touchstone-memory targets, take the case to a DeprEnd-experienced consultant. Navigating these nuances with a trusted peer is how we protect both our clients and our own clinical decision-making. I hope that was a helpful way to think about using DeprEnd with a severely depressed client. This was prompted by a direct question from a reader. If you have a burning question you’d like to see answered in a future newsletter, hit reply and let me know. I read every email. Until next time, Chris Thanks for reading Helicon's EMDR Therapist Weekly, where we aim to provide a weekly dose of insights, tools, and opportunities for EMDR therapists; designed to support your growth, sharpen your practice, and connect you with what's next. If you're not already subscribed, subscribe here. You can also click here to learn about what Helicon is building, or sign up to be notified when the platform is publicly available, if you're an EMDR provider and want to connect with others on the same path. Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is for informational purposes only. This is not legal or clinical advice and we make no guarantees about the outcomes or results from information shared in this document. Proceed at your own risk and discretion. |
A weekly dose of insights, tools, and opportunities for EMDR therapists; designed to support your growth, sharpen your practice, and connect you with what's next.
Hey there, EMDR is everywhere all of a sudden. Have you noticed? BLS audio tracks on meditation apps, tappers you can buy on Amazon, and apps walking clients through "EMDR exercises" between sessions. Even AI tools are now claiming to guide people through reprocessing at home. Some of this is really good news. However, some of it deserves a healthy dose of skepticism. Let me start with the good news. The growing interest in EMDR is validating. For me, at least. For a long time, EMDR sat on...
Hey there, Have you ever sat in Phase 4 with a client, hit a wall, and suddenly felt the room go ice cold? It’s happened to every EMDR clinician, myself included. You do the setup, launch the bilateral stimulation, pass a few sets, check in, only to get met with a blank stare. Or worse, total radio silence. When you ask what came up, they shrug. Or they look at you with mild frustration and say, "Nothing. It's blank." In consultation, clinicians bring me these kinds of scenarios often. They...
Hey there, One of the most common questions I get in consultation (and one that the protocol calls for) is some version of this: How do I know when my client is ready for EMDR? It’s easy to feel the pressure to move quickly. Clients want relief, we want to deliver results, and standard training often makes Phase 2 sound like something you breeze through in two sessions before getting to the "actual" work. That’s why today, I want to walk through what I look for before transitioning a client...