The EMDR Therapist Weekly aims to provide a weekly dose of insights, tools, and opportunities for EMDR therapists; designed to support your growth, sharpen your practice, and connect you with what's next. To achieve this, we occasionally invite subject matter experts as guest writers. So this week, I'm excited to introduce another guest writer, Gail Neves, LMHC.

Gail is a fierce advocate for psychedelic ethics and social justice. They have been practicing trauma focused therapy for 20 years and provide education and consultation on integrative approaches to healing complex trauma.

This topic is complex and nuanced, so please review additional reading materials linked at the end if you'd like to continue exploring further.

Without further ado, Gail Neves writes:

The Art of Bespoke Healing: Integrity and Innovation in Psycholytic EMDR Intensives

The field of trauma recovery is witnessing a golden opportunity: the seamless integration of structured, evidence-based methods with the powerful neurobiological catalysts of low-dose psychedelics. For EMDR clinicians, this presents an invitation to redefine healing by moving beyond generalized protocols toward bespoke treatment planning grounded in ethical depth. This approach ensures that psycholytic EMDR intensives truly honor the unique, complex landscape of each client. While this article focuses on Psycholytic EMDR Intensives utilizing Ketamine as the psychoactive catalyst, it is important to recognize that historically and currently, other psychedelic medicines have been used globally for millennia in combination with structured and community based healing interventions.

Defining psycholytic EMDR

The distinction between psychedelic and psycholytic approaches primarily lies in the dose of the substance administered and the intended therapeutic goal. Psychedelic therapy involves the use of moderate-to-high doses of psychedelic substances to induce "breakthrough experiences" or mystical, and ego-softening journeys. This approach is known to break up rigid belief patterns and can lead to powerful shifts in perspective toward healing. In contrast, psycholytic therapy utilizes smaller doses of psychedelic medicine to induce a non-ordinary state of consciousness where the client remains aware in the present moment and can maintain connection with their therapist.

In a psycholytic EMDR intensive, we move beyond the idea of a one-size-fits-all solution. Over the years it has become evident that EMDR standard protocol can and should be adapted to meet the individual preferences of the client including things like exploring types of sensory needs with bilateral stimulation, leaning into a deeper felt sense with somatic interweaves and inviting transpersonal supports where clients feel held more spiritually. These pieces are very aligned with the healing mechanisms found in psychedelic and psycholytic therapies. This specialized combination of low dose psychedelic medicine and EMDR therapy creates a synergy where the structured framework of EMDR's Adaptive Information Processing (AIP) model meets the neuroplastic enhancing effects of low-dose Ketamine (Reif et al., 2022). Treatment planning must be equally adaptive, viewing the client not exclusively through a diagnostic label, but through a lens of intersectional identity and resilience.

The power of a tailored approach

An individualized plan for each participant in Psycholytic EMDR is essential because the process is highly relational, body-based, and messy—it does not easily translate into measurable data. For example, when clients are experiencing something profound that is ineffable, which happens more often in medicine assisted therapies, asking them to produce a rating on a SUD scale may take them out of a meaningful moment in their healing. In this instance we can pause, allow for silence and trust that the client will tell us what continues to feel disturbing when verbalizing feels right. The psycholytic EMDR intensive can be held the way someone may wear a loose scarf — the framework is there but there is room to breathe. This individualized focus achieves three core benefits:

1. Enhancing Efficacy: By tailoring the intervention, we increase the likelihood of success. This includes selecting the most effective Bilateral Stimulation (BLS) method and structuring the intensive sessions (which often range from 2–4 hours) to match the client's optimal processing pace. Eye movements often are not a great option due to side effects of psychedelic medicine and changes in vision that temporarily arise.
2. Upholding Autonomy: The client centered process emphasizes explicit client consent at every single step, reinforcing the client's agency—a critical component often compromised by trauma.
3. Maximizing the Neuroplastic Window: We leverage the "neuroplastic window" opened by the low-dose medicine to ensure the EMDR reprocessing targets the most relevant memory networks, leading to more profound and durable integration (Raine-Smith & Rose, 2025).

Ethical Depth: Beyond Protocol

Ethical depth in this context means actively addressing potential vulnerabilities inherent in combining a directive process (EMDR) with a heightened state of suggestibility. Psycholytic EMDR Intensive framework rests on a commitment to radical harm reduction and transparency.

Addressing Systemic & Neurobiological Nuances

Clinicians have a responsibility within case conceptualization to zoom out and explore what aspects of the clients presenting issues are related to bigger cultural phenomena. Ultimately ethical screening and treatment planning should be informed by a social justice and anti-oppressive lens. This means:

• Cultural Context: Proactively engaging with the client’s attachment wounds, culturally based trauma, and transgenerational stories. Additionally, inquiring about legacy burdens or ancestral trauma adds a richness and context that underscores the complexities in our clients. We check for systematic oppression that may inform their Negative Cognitions (NCs) and Positive Cognitions (PCs). Ignoring these systemic factors risks pathologizing adaptive responses to trauma and oppression.
• Neurodiversity and Sensory Needs: Recognizing that clients may process information, language, and sensations differently. A tailored plan explicitly addresses the client’s sensory needs to optimize "set and setting" (e.g., lighting, music, scents, comfort items). This ensures the container is truly safe and affirming for neurodiverse individuals. If touch is a part of your practice there needs to be additional attention paid to how your client may wish to receive or not receive touch during Psycholytic EMDR Intensives-including explicit consent through signed documents and verbal confirmation.
• Managing Transference and Power Dynamics: We acknowledge that medicine-assisted modalities amplify transference and relational shifts (Becker, 2014). The therapist must vigilantly manage their own "ethical ego" (Taylor, 2018)—the temptation to be the "hero" or guide the client to a desired outcome. This ensures the client's experience leads to their healing, free from the therapist's unconscious biases or agendas.

Pre-Processing Stabilization and Intentions

How clinicians prepare clients for Psycholytic EMDR intensives, (EMDR Phase 2) becomes a crucial safety mechanism. This step should not be overlooked and can set the tone for how deep the client can meet themselves in the work. A few examples of how Psycholytic EMDR Intensives address the preparation phase include:

• Parts Permission: We gently explore fearful parts or ego states that might resist deeper work. Parts that are fearful, blocking or not consenting to moving forward are held with reverence and respect. We do not bulldoze or bypass- we pause and get curious. Strategies for resourcing, information gathering and soothing these parts are discussed and integrated before reprocessing.
• Psycholytic Resourcing: can be used as a tool for meeting the medicine and strengthening a felt sense of internal scaffolding. Inviting clients to explore nurturing figures, transpersonal supports and positive future self imagery in combination with low dose psychedelics has shown promising results for preparing clients more fully for phases 3-7 EMDR standard protocol.
• Identifying a Golden Thread: We collaboratively identify how the client wishes to feel after the intensive by articulating a core positive belief and a "golden thread" (guiding metaphor/intention) to follow through the subsequent integration period. This focuses the client's internal healing intelligence and what they ultimately want to believe about themselves when the process work is completed.

Knowing When to Pivot and Refer Out

Ethical depth also requires knowing the limits of the initial plan and when a client's needs surpass the scope of psycholytic EMDR. Sometimes clients decide they do not wish to continue EMDR but they want to continue to explore psychedelic therapies. As part of integrating their experiences from the Psycholytic Intensive, clients may discover they are interested in a different kind of therapy, a community based support or simply desire a break from deep or intensive introspection. Clients' agency and self direction must be honored throughout all stages of Psycholytic EMDR Intensives. There are a number of factors that help clinicians best serve their clients in navigating ethical considerations including

• Careful Screening and Awareness of Contraindications: We adhere to rigorous screening, confirming medical clearance and assessing all health concerns and contraindications (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, pregnancy, history of psychosis) to maintain patient safety (Hovda et al., 2024).
• The Need for a Different Approach: Clinicians must be prepared to refer out if a client's presentation shifts unexpectedly. For instance if a client [engaged in psycholytic EMDR intensives using low dose Ketamine] is experiencing treatment-resistant depression it may warrant a more robust intervention than low-dose psycholytic work., The treatment team (therapist, specialists and prescriber) may explore other Ketamine treatments, like a higher-dose psychedelic model or Spravato.
• Integration and Teamwork: We maintain explicit consent for collaborating with the treatment team (prescriber, primary therapist) to ensure smooth transitions if a referral or modification to the medication regimen is necessary. This commitment to teamwork supports the client's safety across different levels of care (Gorman et al., 2021).
• Peer consultation and ongoing mentorship provides an outlet for examining ethical breaches more carefully. We all have blind spots and finding a supportive community, elders or vetted training program can allow for deeper professional growth especially as it relates to psychedelic ethics.

By embracing bespoke treatment planning and holding an ethically integrated container, EMDR clinicians can maximize the transformative potential of these innovative modalities, moving the field toward a future defined by precision, compassion, and justice.

​
Gail Neves, LMHC

Clinicians can learn more about psychedelic ethics and Psycholytic EMDR Intensives by checking out the on demand course Considerations in Harm Reduction for Psycholytic EMDR. Gail has generously offered a 50% discount for Helicon readers, using code: HELICON50 [includes 3 EMDRIA CEU].

Those looking for an in person offering can explore the Psycholytic EMDR Intensives Training-a three day CE course with an optional practicum, held in Boston, MA.

Previous EMDR Therapist Weekly articles on this topic:

• ​An EMDR Therapist's guide to ethical psychedelic integration​
• ​Advanced EMDR Techniques: Post-psychedelic Integration​
• ​Guest Writer: EMDR Principles to Support Adverse Psychedelic Experiences​

EMDRIA OnDemand trainings on this topic:

• ​Integrating EMDR with Psychedelic Harm Reduction and Integration Therapy (1.5 CE)
• ​Psychedelic Assisted EMDR Therapy (PsyA-EMDR) - A Journey of Stabilization (1.5 CE)
• ​Cultivating Liberation: Inclusive Ketamine-Assisted Psychotherapy & EMDR (3 CE)
• ​Psychedelic Assisted Psychotherapy and EMDR (1.5 CE)

Thanks for reading Helicon's EMDR Therapist Weekly, where we aim to provide a weekly dose of insights, tools, and opportunities for EMDR therapists; designed to support your growth, sharpen your practice, and connect you with what's next.

If you're not already subscribed, subscribe here. You can also click here to learn about what Helicon is building, or apply to join our pilot if you're an EMDR provider and want to connect with others on the same path.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this article is for informational purposes only. This is not legal advice and we make no guarantees about the outcomes or results from information shared in this document. Proceed at your own risk and discretion.

References

Becker, J. (2014). Regarding the transpersonal nature of ketamine therapy: An approach to the work. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 33(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2014.33.2.151​

Gorman, I., Nielson, E. M., Molinar, A., Cassidy, K., & Sabbagh, J. (2021). Psychedelic Harm Reduction and Integration: A Transtheoretical Model for Clinical Practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 645246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645246​

Hovda, L. B., Nordberg, J., Ystrom, E., Småbrekke, B., Rognli, E. B., & Skei, L. (2024). A systematic review of the incidence of medical serious adverse events in sub-anesthetic ketamine treatment of psychiatric disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 83, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.03.003​

Raine-Smith, H., & Rose, J. (2025). Psychedelic-Assisted EMDR Therapy: A Memory-Consolidation Approach to Psychedelic Healing (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003431718​

Reif, A., Benca, R. M., & Krystal, J. H. (2022). Ketamine for a boost of neural plasticity: how, but also when? Biological Psychiatry, 92(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.01.002​

Taylor, K. (2018). The ethics of caring: Honoring the client, the practitioner, and the therapeutic process (2nd ed.). The Holotropic Breathwork Community.